|
BIBLE STUDY
ACTS
11:1-30
REVIEW:
Chapter 10 was the story about the
conversion of the Roman Centurion Cornelius and his household. This
was an extremely significant event in the life of the Christian
church – for this is the first outreach activity to Gentiles.
As the chapter makes clear, Peter (and other Jewish believers with
him) also had to be “converted” by receiving a direct vision from
God that no one should be called “profane or unclean” (vs. 28).
In the end, as Peter is proclaiming
the gospel message to Cornelius and his household, the Holy Spirit
fell upon all who were listening to him – the final confirmation to
Peter and his companions that God had chosen them to be a part of
his people. Therefore, Peter ordered them to receive water baptism
– as an acknowledgement of their full inclusion as a part of the
Christian community.
CHAPTER 11:1-18
“Peter’s Defense”
“Now the apostles and the
believers who were in Judea heard that the Gentiles had also
accepted the word of God. So when Peter went up to Jerusalem, the
circumcised believers criticized him, saying, “Why did you go to
uncircumcised men and eat with them?” Then Peter began to
explain it to them, step by step, saying, “I was in the city of
Joppa praying, and in a trance I saw a vision. There was something
like a large sheet coming down from heaven, being lowered by its
four corners; and it came close to me. As I looked at it closely I
saw four-footed animals, beasts of prey, reptiles, and birds of the
air. I also heard a voice saying to me, “Get up, Peter; kill and
eat.” But I replied, ‘By no means, Lord; for nothing profane or
unclean has ever entered my mouth. But a second time the voice
answered from heaven, ‘What God has made clean, you must not call
profane.’ This happened three times; then everything was pulled up
again to heaven. At that very moment three men, sent to me from
Caesarea, arrived at the house where we were. The Spirit told me to
go with them and not to make a distinction between them and us.
These sic brothers also accompanied me, and we entered the man’s
house. He told us how he had seen the angel standing in his house
and saying, ‘Send to Joppa and bring Simon, who is called Peter; he
will give you a message by which you and your entire household will
be saved.’ And as I began to speak, the Holy Spirit fell upon them
just as it had upon us at the beginning. And I remembered the word
of the Lord, how he had said, ‘John baptized with water, but you
will be baptized with the Holy Spirit.’ If then God gave them the
same gift that he gave us when we believed in the Lord Jesus Christ,
who was I that I could hinder God?” When they heard this, they
were silenced. And they praised God, saying, “Then God has given
even to the Gentiles the repentance that leads to life.”
As William Barclay in his Daily Study Bible commentary
states, the importance that Luke attached to Cornelius’ conversion
is shown by the amount of space he devoted to it. He twice relates
the entire story in full!
The emphasis of the story in this
chapter, however, is slightly different than in chapter 10. Here
the over-riding issue seems to be about the kind of relationships
which believing Jews could have with believing Gentiles. Could
Jewish Christians share meals with them? Where these new Gentile
Christians of equal status with those who first believed?
The fact that Cornelius and other
Gentiles had “accepted the word of God” does not seem to be a
problem with Peter’s critics – it was rather that Peter had shared
table fellowship with these Gentiles.
Luke Timothy Johnson in his commentary
on the Gospel of Luke states: “The problem was a real one. For a
Jew to eat without attending to ritual purity or to dietary
regulations meant loss of identity, for the entire rationale for
such regulations was the “holiness,” that is the separateness, of
this people based on the commandments of God… Peter’s opponents
imply that by being willing to eat with Gentiles, he has abandoned
his own heritage as a Jew, and has also jeopardized the identity of
the messianic community as the people of God.”
Peter in defense recounts his
entire vision point by point to show that what he did was in
response to a direct revelation from God. As he explicitly says in
verse 12; “The Spirit told me to go with
them and not to make a distinction between them and us.”
Peter also makes another argument as
well by pointing out that “these six brothers also
accompanied me, and we entered the man’s house.” These
“six brothers” were probably members of the circumcision
party – and Peter notes that they did not object about going to
Cornelius. Also, we note that these six plus Peter made seven
witnesses. As Barclay notes, in Egyptian law, which the Jews would
know well, seven witnesses were necessary to completely prove a
case. In Roman law, which they would also know well, seven seals
were necessary to authenticate a really important document. The
fact that seven Jewish Christians had gone to a Gentile home
and witnessed their conversion showed that this was very
significant.
Finally, Peter reminds them that the
baptism of the Holy Spirit was a gift – not something which
anyone “earned”. By giving believing Gentiles the same gift that he
had given to believing Jews, God thereby showed that they
were completely equal to Jews in his sight. For believing Jews to
act otherwise in their dealings with believing Gentiles, Peter sums
up, would be for them to hinder God.
The point is that we must not treat
others differently if God treats us the same. If we are all equal
in God’s sight, then we as his people must also relate with each
other in the same way. Ethic, racial, and gender distinctions are
abolished.
CHAPTER 11:19-21 “The
Founding of the Church at Antioch”
“Now those who were
scattered because of the persecution that took place over Stephen
traveled as far as Phoenicia, Cyprus, and Antioch, and they spoke
the word to no one except Jews. But among them were some men of
Cyprus and Cyrene who, on coming to Antioch, spoke to the Hellenists
also, proclaiming the Lord Jesus. The hand of the Lord was with
them, and a great number became believers and turned to the Lord.”
The previous section highlighted the role of Peter in the church’s
outreach to Gentiles. Now Luke returns to the narrative that was
dropped back in 8:1-4 about the ministry of other various persons
(whose names are unknown) who were scattered because of the
persecution in Jerusalem that began after Stephen’s death. Most
likely these other persons were all “Hellenist” Jewish Christians.
At first they only reached out to other Hellenist Jews, but then
some among them began to evangelize among Gentiles also. (The NRSV
states that they also spoke to the “Hellenists” – but the
alternative and probably correct translation is that they spoke to
the Greeks (Gentiles) also.) This was a very significant
development in the life of the early Church, and it is noteworthy
that this activity apparently took place independently of any
direction from the “mother Church” at Jerusalem. The men who did
this were from Cyprus (the home of Barnabas – see Acts 4:36)
and Cyrene (a province in North Africa – modern day Libya.
This passage also introduces us to
Antioch and the church that was founded there. Antioch,
according to the Jewish historian Josephus, was the third largest
city in the Roman Empire – only Rome itself and Alexandria of Egypt
had more people. Antioch is located in Syria, and was a very
cosmopolitan city. As we shall see later, the church founded in
this city became the “headquarters” for outreach activity to
Gentiles throughout the world – and it eventually eclipsed the
Jerusalem church as the center of the Christian movement.
CHAPTER 11:22-26 “The
Ministry of Barnabas at Antioch”
“News of this came to the
ears of the church in Jerusalem, and they sent Barnabas to Antioch.
When he came and saw the grace of God, he rejoiced, and he exhorted
them all to remain faithful to the Lord with steadfast devotion; for
he was a good man, full of the Holy Spirit and of faith. And a
great may people were brought to the Lord. Then Barnabas went to
Tarsus to look for Saul, and when he had found him, he brought him
to Antioch. So it was that for an entire year they met with the
church and taught a great many people, and it was in Antioch that
the disciples were first called “Christians.”
This is Barnabas’ third appearance in the narrative of Acts – the
first two being in Acts 4:36-37 and then later in Acts
9:27 where he becomes Saul’s sponsor when no one else in the
church wanted to have anything to do with him.
Barnabas was a natural choice for the
Jerusalem church to send to Antioch. He was a native of Cyprus
(Acts 4:36) and thus a countryman of some of those who were
reaching out to the Gentiles. He was also by his disposition a
“son of encouragement” (Acts 4:36) who looked for the
good in people rather than focusing on the negative. (Think about
what it would have meant for the future of Christianity if the
Jerusalem church had sent someone from the circumcism faction to
Antioch - they would probably have complained about the outreach
activity to Gentiles in the same way they had criticized Peter
earlier and would have stirred up a storm of controversy which could
have hampered the church’s expansion!) It was truly the grace of
God that Barnabas was the person whom was sent!
Barnabas is also significant here
because he made the decision to go and recruit Saul to come to
Antioch from Tarsus to help him in the ministry of teaching. Once
again he becomes Saul’s mentor and patron.
Finally, Luke tells us that it was in
Antioch that disciples were first called “Christians.” This was a
nickname given by outsiders to followers of Jesus – literally
meaning “Christ-folk”. As William Barclay notes, the people of
Antioch were famous for their talent in finding jesting nicknames.
The term “Christian” was probably meant to be a “put-down”, but soon
the followers of Jesus proudly adopted it as a description of who
and what they were.
CHAPTER 11:27-29
“Antioch Helps the Church at Jerusalem”
“At that time prophets
came down from Jerusalem to Antioch. One of them named Agabus stood
up and predicted by the Spirit that there would be a severe famine
over all the world; and this took place during the reign of
Claudius. The disciples determined that according to their ability,
each would send relief to the believers living in Judea; this they
did, sending it to the elders by Barnabas and Saul.”
Prophets had two roles – to “forth-tell” and to “fore-tell”.
Agabus (who is also mentioned later in Acts 21:10-11) is
shown here as doing both. There were indeed many famines throughout
the empire during the reign of Claudius (41 -54 C.E.), and
the Jewish historian Josephus explicitly mentions a great famine in
Judea during 46 C.E.
The “forth-telling” part of Agabus’
prophecy was likely that the Christians in Antioch should not sit
idly by while fellow Christians in Judea were starving. So it
should be with us today – love demands that we love and care for
each other, especially our brothers and sisters in Christ.
--------------------
George R.
Karres,
Pella
Lutheran Church
418 W. Main
Street
Sidney, MT
59270
gkarres@pellachurch.net
|