|
The Book of Acts
Introduction
Chapter 1
Chapter 2
Chapter 3
Chapter 4
Chapter 5
Chapter 6
Chapter 7
Chapter 8
Chapter 9
Chapter 10
Chapter 11
Chapter 12
Chapter 13
Chapter 14
Chapter 15
Chapter 16
Chapter 17
Chapter 18
Chapter 19
Chapter 20
Chapter 21
Chapter 22
Chapter 23
Chapter 24
Chapter 25
Chapter 26
Chapter 27
Chapter 28
|
BIBLE STUDY
ACTS 21:1-36
REVIEW: Chapter
20 was basically a “travelogue” of Paul’s itinerary after his three
year stay in Ephesus. At the beginning of the chapter, Luke in six
short verses summarizes about a year of journey and adventure: that
Paul went to Macedonia; then to Greece (Achaia – Corinth) where he
stayed for three months; his return through Macedonia (where he was
joined by at least seven named companions from various churches);
and then to Troas where Luke and others joined him. As I (Pastor
George) mentioned, it is interesting to note what Luke does not
mention in his account – such as the troubles in the Corinthian
church; that he wrote his letter to the Romans during his stay in
Greece; and that one of the major reasons why Paul was traveling
from city to city was to collect an offering for the less privileged
Christians in Jerusalem.
Luke next highlights an interesting
story of a young man named Eutychus, who became overcome by sleep
during Paul’s long speaking and fell out a window to the ground
three floors below.
After detailing more details of Paul’s
itinerary and his desire to arrive in Jerusalem by the day of
Pentecost, Luke then narrates a long farewell message that Paul gave
to the elders of the Ephesus church.
CHAPTER 21:1-14 “No Retreat”
“When we had parted from
them and set sail, we came by a straight course to Cos, and the next
day to Rhodes, and from there to Patara. When we found a ship bound
for Phoenicia, we went on board and set sail. We came in sight of
Cyprus; and leaving it on our left, we sailed to Syria and landed at
Tyre, because the ship was to unload its cargo there. We looked up
the disciples and stayed there for seven days. Through the Spirit
they told Paul not to go on to Jerusalem. When our days there were
ended, we left and proceeded on our journey; and all of them, with
wives and children, escorted us outside the city. There we knelt
down on the beach and prayed and said farewell to one another. Then
we went on board the ship, and they returned home. When we had
finished the voyage from Tyre, we arrived at Ptolemais; and we
greeted the believers and stayed with them for one day. The next
day we left and came to Caesarea; and we went into the house of
Philip the evangelist, one of the seven, and stayed with him. He
had four unmarried daughters who had the gift of prophecy. While we
were staying there for several days, a prophet named Agabus came
down from Judea. He came to us and took Paul’s belt, bound his own
feet and hands with it, and said, “Thus says the Holy Spirit,
‘This is the way the Jews in Jerusalem will bind the man who owns
this belt and will hand him over to the Gentiles.’” When we
heard this, we and the people there urged him not to go up to
Jerusalem. Then Paul answered, “What are you doing, weeping and
breaking my heart? For I am ready not only to be bound but even to
die in Jerusalem for the name of the Lord Jesus.” Since he
would not be persuaded, we remained silent except to say, “The
Lord’s will be done.” Luke again
picks up his “travelogue” narrative of Paul’s journey to Jerusalem.
But besides the geographical details, the main point of this section
as a whole is that Paul is journeying toward persecution and
imprisonment – and that this journey “re-enacts” Jesus’
journey to Jerusalem and Jesus’ predictions of his coming
passion.
In his farewell message to the
Ephesian church elders in the previous chapter, Paul had stated
“that the Holy Spirit testifies to me in every city that
imprisonment and persecutions are waiting for me.” (Acts 20:23).
Now Luke details some of those specific warnings.
Not only that, two characters from
earlier in Acts suddenly make a reappearance in Luke’s narrative.
We last heard about Philip in Acts 8:40 – when after
baptizing the Ethiopian eunuch he had come to Azotus and then to
Caesarea (which apparently was his home town). Now Philip has four
daughters, who like their father also have the gift of prophecy.
Also, Agabus – who earlier in Acts 11:27-28 had come
down from Jerusalem to Antioch and “predicted by the Spirit that
there would be a severe famine over all the world” also
reappears. His dramatized prophecy that Paul will be bound and
handed over to the Gentiles is remarkably close to the passion
predictions of Jesus in Lk. 9:44 and Lk. 18:32. This
similarity is reinforced by Paul’s response that he, like Jesus, is
willing “to die in Jerusalem.” Paul is determined to go on
and accomplish his ministry no matter what, just like Jesus.
The final response of Paul’s friends
that “The Lord’s will be done” also reminds us of Jesus’
response in his prayer on the night of his betrayal: “not my will
but yours be done.” (Lk. 22:42) This is the appropriate
response of obedient faith for all of Jesus’ followers.
CHAPTER 21:15-26 “Paul
and the Jerusalem Leadership”
“After these days we got
ready and started to go up to Jerusalem. Some of the disciples from
Caesarea also came along and brought us to the house of Mnason of
Cyprus, an early disciple, with whom we were to stay. When we
arrived in Jerusalem, the brothers welcomed us warmly. The next day
Paul went with us to visit James; and all the elders were present.
After greeting them, he related one by one the things that God had
done among the Gentiles through his ministry. When they heard it,
they praised God. Then they said to him, “You see, brother, how
many thousands of believers there are among the Jews, and they are
all zealous for the law. They have been told about you that you
teach all the Jews living among the Gentiles to forsake Moses, and
that you tell them not to circumcise their children or observe the
customs. When then is to be done? They will certainly hear that
you have come. So do what we tell you. We have four men who are
under a vow. Join these men, go through the rite of purification
with them, and pay for the shaving of their heads. Thus all will
know that there is nothing in what they have been told about you,
but that you yourself observe and guard the law. But as for the
Gentiles who have become believers, we have sent a letter with our
judgment that they should abstain from what has been sacrificed to
idols and from blood and from what is strangled and from fornication.”
Then Paul took the men, and the next day, having purified himself,
he entered the temple with them, making public the completion of the
days of purification when the sacrifice would be made for each of
them.” As Luke Timothy Johnson states
in his commentary, this is one of the most difficult and painful
parts of Luke’s narrative – not only for what is said but also for
what is not said. As he writes: “some of the difficulty
and pain are connected to the conflicts Paul will experience in the
city. But some is attached to the reader’s sense that there may be
some distance between the story as Luke tells it and the historical
realities as they are suggested by Paul’s letters. Luke’s account
is not utterly transparent, and its obscurities may owe something to
an attempt to make his story come out better than the evidence
suggests it did.”
Indeed, when we consider the evidence
it seems most likely that Paul’s ministry was not accepted by
the Jerusalem church. As we know from Paul’s own letters, the major
reason for his journey to Jerusalem was to deliver an elaborate
collection from the Gentile churches as a symbol of reconciliation
between these communities and the Jewish believers in Jerusalem
(Gal. 2:10; 1 Cor. 16:1-4; 2 Cor. 8-9). He saw the collection
as a way of completing his Eastern mission before beginning a new
venture in the West, for which Rome was to be his new base of
operations (Rom. 15:22-29). He asked the Roman Church to
pray that his ministry (alt. reading; “my bringing of a gift”)
“may be acceptable to the saints.”
Yet Luke makes no mention whatsoever
of all this. Instead, after writing that “the brothers welcomed
us warmly” – he then goes on to relate that many of the Jewish
believers have been told that “you teach all the Jews living
among the Gentiles to forsake Moses, and that you tell them not to
circumcise their children or observe the customs.” To me
(Pastor George) this is hardly the sign of a warm welcome. Indeed,
instead of emphasizing that Paul “remember the poor” (which
Paul in Gal. 2:10 says was the agreement the Jerusalem church
made with him), they once again bring up their judgment (from
Acts 15:20) that Gentile believers “should abstain from
what has been sacrificed to idols and from blood and from what is
strangled and from fornication.”
We also note that after Paul is
later arrested and imprisoned, Luke makes no mention of him
receiving any support from the Jerusalem church – in stark contrast
to how during Peter’s arrest and imprisonment in Acts 12:3-5,
“the church prayed fervently to God for
him.”
All of this taken together seems to
indicate that Paul’s ministry of reconciliation to the Jerusalem
church did not go as he had hoped – and was in fact a failure.
Instead of mentioning this, Luke
portrays the issue as being one of Paul’s own fidelity to his Jewish
heritage. We know from Luke’s narrative so far in Acts that Paul
personally is an observant Jew. He had Timothy circumcised
(Acts 16:3) and had personally taken a Nazirite vow (Acts
18:18).
Supposedly, James and the elders know
this. But to appease the zealous majority of observant Jewish
Christians in the Jerusalem church, they ask Paul to “prove” his
fidelity to the Judaism by publicly joining four Jewish Christians
completing a Nazirite vow and paying the offering for their rite of
purification.
As William Barclay writes in his
Daily Study Bible commentary, there can be no doubt that the
matter was distasteful to Paul. But it is the sign of a truly great
man that he can subordinate his own wishes and views for the sake of
the Church. There is a time when compromise is not a sign of
weakness but of strength.
CHAPTER 21:27-40 ”The
Riot in Jerusalem”
“When the seven days were
almost completed, the Jews from Asia, who had seen him in the
temple, stirred up the whole crowd. They seized him, shouting, “Fellow
Israelites, help! This is the man who is teaching everyone
everywhere against our people, our law, and this place; more than
that, he has actually brought Greeks into the temple and has defiled
this holy place.” For they had previously seen Trophimus the
Ephesian with him in the city, and they supposed that Paul had
brought him into the temple. Then all the city was aroused, and the
people rushed together. They seized Paul and dragged him out of the
temple, and immediately the doors were shut. While they were trying
to kill him, word came to the tribune of the cohort that all
Jerusalem was in an uproar. Immediately he took soldiers and
centurions and ran down to them. When they saw the tribune and the
soldiers, they stopped beating Paul. Then the tribune came,
arrested him, and ordered him to be bound with two chains; he
inquired who he was and what he had done. Some in the crowd shouted
one thing, some another; and as he could not learn the facts because
of the uproar, he ordered him to be brought into the barracks. When
Paul came to the steps, the violence of the mob was so great that he
had to be carried by the soldiers. The crowd that followed kept
shouting, “Away with him! Just as Paul was about to be
brought into the barracks, he said to the tribune, “May I say
something to you?” The tribune replied, “Do you know Greek?
Then you are not the Egyptian who recently stirred up a revolt and
led the four thousand assassins out into the wilderness?” Paul
replied, “I am a Jew, from Tarsus in Cilicia, a citizen of an
important city; I beg you, let me speak to the people.” When he
had given him permission, Paul stood on the steps and motioned to
the people for silence; and when there was a great hush, he
addressed them in the Hebrew language, saying:”
Luke has already noted the hostility of the Asian (Ephesian) Jews
towards Paul (Acts 19:9; 20;19). Part of their charge –
about Paul’s supposed teaching against the Jews and the Jewish law –
echoes the rumors which the Jerusalem church elders have already
related to him in the previous section.
But the charge that actually starts
the riot is that Paul has “brought Greeks into the temple and has
defiled this holy place.” It is interesting to note that this
charge is in some ways similar to what had been made against
Stephen (“This man never stops saying things against this
holy place and the law; for we have heard him say that this Jesus of
Nazareth will destroy this place and will change the customs that
Moses handed on to us. – Acts 6:13-14) and even against Jesus
himself (“We heard him say, ‘I will destroy this temple that is
made with hands, and in three days I will build another, not made
with hands.” – Mk. 14:58).
Bringing Gentiles into inner court of
the temple was a capital offense. We know that Paul was innocent of
this, but Luke notes that the Jews from Asia had previously seen
Trophimus the Ephesian (Acts 20:4) with him in the city and
(wrongly) assumed that Paul had brought him into the temple. (An
interesting side-point: no mention is made of any of the rest of
Paul’s gentile companions mentioned in Acts 20:1-6.)
After they dragged Paul out of the
temple, “the doors were shut” to keep the ensuing riot
outside of the sacred precincts. The Romans rescue him from the
mob, and then the tribune ordered him to be bound with two chains
(thus fulfilling Agabus’ prophecy in Acts 21:11).
The tribune at first believes that
Paul is an Egyptian rebel who stirred up a revolt during the
governorship of Felix in 54 C.E. The Jewish historian Josephus also
mentions him. The Romans had swiftly deal with the rebellion, but
the Egyptian leader had escaped – and that is why – especially since
Paul spoke cultured Greek – the tribune thought that Paul might have
been him.
Paul in reply says that he is a Jew
from Tarsus in Cilicia (which would explain his understanding of the
Greek language). When he stated his credentials, the tribune knew
that, whatever he was, Paul was no revolutionary thug – and he gave
Paul permission to speak to the people – which he then proceeds to
do in their language of Hebrew (or “Aramaic”).
--------------------
George R.
Karres,
Pella
Lutheran Church
418 W. Main
Street
Sidney, MT
59270
gkarres@pellachurch.net
|