|
The Book of Acts
Introduction
Chapter 1
Chapter 2
Chapter 3
Chapter 4
Chapter 5
Chapter 6
Chapter 7
Chapter 8
Chapter 9
Chapter 10
Chapter 11
Chapter 12
Chapter 13
Chapter 14
Chapter 15
Chapter 16
Chapter 17
Chapter 18
Chapter 19
Chapter 20
Chapter 21
Chapter 22
Chapter 23
Chapter 24
Chapter 25
Chapter 26
Chapter 27
Chapter 28
|
BIBLE STUDY
ACTS 26:1-32
REVIEW:
In chapter 25, the Roman governor Felix was succeeded by Porcius
Festus. The chief priests and Paul’s other Jewish opponents
immediately began to badger him about Paul. They first asked him to
have Paul brought up from Caesarea to Jerusalem (according to Luke,
they were actually planning to ambush and kill him on the way).
When Festus instead invited them to come to Caesarea, they came and
once again began to accuse Paul.
Festus, seeking a compromise,
suggested that Paul be brought to Jerusalem and be tried by him
there. Paul then invoked his right as a Roman citizen to have his
case decided by the Emperor in Rome.
Finally, Festus invited King Agrippa
to hear Paul’s case. Agrippa would presumably have a greater
understanding of Jewish controversies – which would help Festus to
better articulate exactly why Paul was being sent to Rome for
trial. As I (Pastor George) also mentioned, involving King Agrippa
would also give Festus some “political cover” from the Jewish
leaders for having Paul sent to Rome rather than to Jerusalem for
trial.
CHAPTER 26:1-11 “Paul’s Defense
before Agrippa – His Former Life in Judaism”
“Agrippa said to Paul, “You
have permission to speak for yourself.” Then Paul stretched out
his hand and began to defend himself: “I consider myself
fortunate that it is before you, King Agrippa, I am to make my
defense today against all the accusations of the Jews, because you
are especially familiar with all the customs and controversies of
the Jews; therefore I beg of you to listen to me patiently. All the
Jews know my way of life from my youth, a life spent beginning among
my own people and in Jerusalem. They have known for a long time, if
they are willing to testify, that I have belonged to the strictest
sect of our religion and lived as a Pharisee. And now I stand here
on trial on account of my hope in the promise make by God to our
ancestors, a promise that our twelve tribes hope to attain, as they
earnestly worship day and night. It is for this hope, your
Excellency, that I am accused by Jews! Why is it thought incredible
by any of you that God raises the dead? Indeed, I myself was
convinced that I ought to do many things against the name of Jesus
of Nazareth. And that is what I did in Jerusalem; with authority
received from the chief priests, I not only locked up many of the
saints in prison, but I also cast my vote against them when they
were being condemned to death. By punishing them often in all the
synagogues I tried to force them to blaspheme; and since I was so
furiously enraged at them, I pursued them even to foreign cities.”
Paul’s speech before Festus, Agrippa, and Bernice is his last major
discourse. After this, we will overhear only short exchanges with
his fellows-travelers, and a final sad encounter with the Jews of
Rome (28:17-28). This is also Paul’s longest speech, and Luke has
prepared for it elaborately in the last chapter by assembling the
Roman governor, the Jewish king, their entourage, and the nobility
of the city of Caesarea. We might say that this speech is the final
summary of what and what Jesus is to Paul.
Paul repeats his assertion that he is
on trial because of his hope in the resurrection of the dead. This
is the third time that Luke has Paul stating this (see also
23:6 and 24:15). In other words, this is more than
just a casual statement. We might expect Paul to state that he was
on trial because of his faith in Jesus as the Messiah. But for
Paul, however, the resurrection and Jesus’ Messiahship are
linked. For Paul, that Jesus is the Messiah is proven by his
resurrection. As he writes at the beginning of Romans: “(Jesus)
was declared to be Son of God with power according to the spirit of
holiness by resurrection from the dead. (Rom. 1:4)
Finally, in this section Paul recounts
his former life in Judaism – especially as being a persecutor of the
Church. Paul never tried to hide what he had been in the past –
instead uses the retelling of his former life to show that he is
truly a changed man. In a way, he sees his former relationship with
God as “dead” – and that now he is “alive” to God through Jesus.
(Let us explore Romans 6:1-11.) Paul’s changed life is also
a “resurrection!
CHAPTER 26:12-18 “Paul’s Defense
before Agrippa – His Conversion Experience”
“With this in mind, I
was traveling to Damascus with the authority and commission of the
chief priests, when at midday along the road, your Excellency, I saw
a light from heaven, brighter than the sun, shining around my and my
companions. When we had all fallen to the ground, I heard a voice
saying to me in the Hebrew language, ‘Saul, Saul, why are you
persecuting me? It hurts you to kick against the goads.’ I asked,
‘Who are you, Lord?’ The Lord answered, ‘I am Jesus whom you are
persecuting. But get up and stand on your feet; for I have appeared
to you for this purpose, to appoint you to serve and testify to the
things in which you have seen me and to those in which I will appear
to you. I will rescue you from your people and from the Gentiles –
to whom I am sending you to open their eyes so that they may turn
from darkness to light and from the power of Satan to God, so that
they may receive forgiveness of sins and a place among those who are
sanctified by faith in me.” This
is the third time that Paul’s conversion experience on the road to
Damascus is recounted in Acts (see also 9:1-9; 22:6-16). The
story is the same, but this telling also has some additional points
not mentioned in the other accounts. Specifically, in this telling
all of Paul’s party fell to the ground (not just Paul). Paul
mentions that Jesus spoke to him “in the Hebrew (Aramaic)
language”.
Also, Jesus in this account tells Paul
that “It hurts you to kick against the goads.” This was a
common phrase of speech – a goad was a cattle prod. Paul up
until this point had been violently resisting God’s “prodding” to
repent and believe in Jesus as the Messiah.
Finally, in this third telling of the
vision Jesus directly tells Paul what his future ministry will be.
There is no mention of Ananias, or of a subsequent vision in the
temple. The effect is to “sharpen” the understanding that Paul is
an apostle who was directly commissioned by Jesus Christ.
CHAPTER 26:19-23 “Paul’s Defense
Before Agrippa – His Obedience to Christ”
“After that, King
Agrippa, I was not disobedient to the heavenly vision, but declared
first to those in Damascus, then in Jerusalem and throughout the
countryside of Judea, and also to the Gentiles, that they should
repent and turn to God and do deeds consistent with repentance. For
this reason the Jews seized me in the temple and tried to kill me.
To this day I have had help from God, and so I stand here,
testifying to both small and great, saying nothing but what the
prophets and Moses said would take place: that the Messiah must
suffer, and that, by being the first to rise from the dead, he would
proclaim light both to our people and to the Gentiles.”
The chronological details of Paul’s subsequent ministry are not
necessarily accurate. There is no record elsewhere of Paul having a
ministry in Judea. Indeed, Paul himself in his letter to the
Galatians states that he did not go to Jerusalem until three years
after his conversion – and then only to visit Cephas (Peter) and
James for fifteen days – and that he was
“unknown by sight to the churches of Judea that are in Christ.”
(Gal. 1:17-24)
Be that as it may, the point here is
that Paul did immediately begin proclaiming the gospel after
his conversion. He also states the three major points of his gospel
message:
-
Repentance
– the Greek word (“metanoia”) literally means “to
change one’s mind”. As Barclay writes in his Daily Study
Bible commentary: “To repent means to realize that the kind
of life we are living is wrong and that we must adopt a
completely new set of values. To that end, it involves two
things. It involves sorrow for what we have been and it
involves the resolve that by the grace of God we will be
changed.”
-
Turn to God
– Again from Barclay: “So often we have our backs to God. It
may be in thoughtless disregard; it may be because we have
deliberately gone to the far countries of the soul. But,
however that may be, Paul calls on us to let the God who was
nothing to us become the God who is everything to us.”
-
Do deeds consistent with
repentance – Barclay writes about
this: “The proof of genuine repentance and turning to God is a
certain kind of life. But these deeds are not merely the
reaction of someone whose life is governed by a new series of
laws; they are the result of a new love. The person
who has come to know the love of God in Jesus Christ knows now
that if he sins he does not only break God’s law; he breaks
God’s heart.
Finally, Paul again asserts that
Jesus’ suffering and resurrection was foretold by Moses and the
prophets. As I mentioned above, for Paul Jesus’ resurrection
proves that he is the Messiah (the one who will save people (both
Jews and Gentiles) from sin and (eternal) death).
CHAPTER 26:24-32 “Festus and
Agrippa Respond to Paul’s Speech
“While he was making this
defense, Festus exclaimed, “You are out of your mind, Paul! Too
much learning is driving you insane!” But Paul said, “I am
not out of my mind, most excellent Festus, but I am speaking the
sober truth. Indeed the king knows about these things, and him I
speak freely; for I am certain that none of these things has escaped
his notice, for this was not done in a corner. King Agrippa, do you
believe the prophets? I know that you believe.” Agrippa said
to Paul, “Are you so quickly persuading me to become a Christian?”
Paul replied, “Whether quickly or not, I pray to God that not
only you but also all who are listening to me today might become
such as I am – except for these chains.” Then the king got up,
and with him the governor and Bernice and those who had been seated
with them; and as they were leaving, they said to one another, “This
man is doing nothing to deserve death or imprisonment.” Agrippa
said to Festus, “This man could have been set free if he had not
appealed to the Emperor.” The
main reason for Festus’ reaction is Paul’s assertion of Jesus’
resurrection from the dead. To a pagan Roman, such a concept
would be utter nonsense.
In response, after asserting that he
is speaking the “sober truth”, Paul then turns his attention
specifically to King Agrippa. Why? Because Agrippa “knows” (the
Greek word literally means “is an expert”) about the Jewish hope of
a resurrection of the dead. Even if Agrippa would not believe in
Jesus as the Messiah, he would at least believe in the hope of a
resurrection.
On one level, Paul’s “defense” before
Festus and Agrippa was successful. Both of them (and Bernice) ended
up being convinced that Paul was innocent of the charges which the
Jewish leaders had made against him – and that he could have been
set free if he had not appealed to the Emperor.
But at another level, Paul’s “defense”
was not successful. He was not simply seeking his own
survival, but that Festus, Agrippa, and the rest of his hearers
should “repent” and put their faith in Jesus. This of course does
not happen. Festus will not even admit the reality of a
resurrection from death. Agrippa will, but his only reaction to
Paul’s plea about believing the prophets is dismissive humor.
--------------------
George R.
Karres,
Pella
Lutheran Church
418 W. Main
Street
Sidney, MT
59270
gkarres@pellachurch.net
|