|
The Gospel of Mark
Introduction
Chapter 1
Chapter 2
Chapter 3
Chapter 4
Chapter 5
Chapter 6
Chapter 7
Chapter 8
Chapter 9
Chapter 10
Chapter 11
Chapter 12
Chapter 13
Chapter 14
Chapter 15
Chapter 16
|
BIBLE STUDY
MARK 11:1-33
REVIEW:
Chapter 10 began with some Pharisees
asking Jesus about whether it was lawful for a man to divorce his
wife. The Pharisees were concerned about what constituted
grounds for divorce. Jesus, however, makes the subtle but very
important point that although Moses “allowed” divorce, it was
certainly not God’s intention. Jesus also makes it clear
that whenever a person divorces one’s wife or husband and (or
perhaps in order to) marries another commits adultery. It
may be “lawful”, but it is still a sin in God’s sight.
The next section was about Jesus
blessing little children. A major point for us to understand about
this was that children were not highly valued – and that they were
weak and vulnerable. The disciples apparently thought that Jesus’
time should not be “wasted” by these children. Jesus, however, is
especially concerned for those who are weak, vulnerable, and
accounted as being of little value. It is for people like these –
for children – that God especially cares about and for whom his
kingdom belongs. Time spent with these “insignificant” people, as
far as Jesus is concerned, is always time well used.
The next several sections are
perhaps “amplifications” of Jesus’ teaching that we must receive the
kingdom “as a little child.”
1.
The rich man thought
that he could “inherit” eternal life by “doing”
something – by being “good enough”. Jesus, however, wants
him to understand that only God is “good”. We can only
receive eternal life when we recognize that it is by grace
alone and NOT by anything we do to “earn” it (in other
words, to understand ourselves as being like children).
2.
Jesus goes on to say
that it is hard for those who have wealth to enter the kingdom.
Why? Because wealth gives us a false sense of security or
self-sufficiency and thereby keeps us from recognizing our need
and dependence upon God’s grace.
3.
The disciples have
left everything in order to follow Jesus, and thereby have made
themselves completely vulnerable (like children!). As Pastor Josh
put it, “they have made themselves last in
society, and have become some of the first into the kingdom.”
Next, Jesus gives the third
foretelling of his passion and resurrection – this time explicitly
suggesting Gentile involvement and telling about the extent of his
suffering in much greater detail. The important thing, however, is
what the disciples constantly seem to miss – that he will rise
again! This is something that WE need to keep in mind as we
suffer – that, like Jesus, even though we die we will rise again!
James and John then ask Jesus to grant
that they would be the ones to sit at his right hand and his left in
his glory. Perhaps they are trying to usurp the places of honor
from the others. On the other hand, Pastor Josh makes the
speculation that they actually might be asking to share in Jesus’
Passion (and that the role they asked for was given to the two
thieves who were on the crosses on his right and on his
left). Jesus in his address to the ten underscores his teaching
that “greatness” comes by serving, by being “last” and “slave” of
all, and by being even willing to give one’s life for others.
The final section is about the healing
of the blind beggar, Bartimaeus. He, like the children, is at first
treated sternly by those surrounding Jesus. He, like a child, has
no claim upon Jesus’ mercy but receives it nevertheless. Jesus says
that his faith has made him well. This phrase, which he has
said previously to the woman with a hemorrhage (Mk. 5:34),
encourages us to approach Jesus boldly and expect him to have what
we need.
CHAPTER 11:1-11 “Jesus’ Entry
Into Jerusalem”
“When they were
approaching Jerusalem, at Bethphage and Bethany, near the Mount of
Olives, he sent two of his disciples and said to them, “Go into
the village ahead of you, and immediately as you enter it, you will
find tied there a colt that has never been ridden; untie it and
bring it. If anyone says to you, ‘Why are you doing this?’ just say
this, ‘The Lord needs it and will send it back here immediately.’”
They went away and found a colt tied near a door, outside in the
street. As they were untying it, some of the bystanders said to
them, “What are you doing, untying the colt?” They told them
what Jesus had said; and they allowed them to take it. Then they
brought the colt to Jesus and threw their cloaks on it; and he sat
on it Many people spread their cloaks on the road, and others
spread leafy branches that they had cut in the fields. Then those
who went ahead and those who followed were shouting, “Hosanna!
Blessed is the one who comes in the name of the Lord! Blessed is
the coming kingdom of our ancestor David! Hosanna in the highest
heaven!” Then he entered Jerusalem and went into the temple;
and when he had looked at everything, as it was already late, he
went out to Bethany with the twelve.”
The inclusion of the village of Bethany is probably wrong.
Matthew in his gospel only mentions Bethphage – Bethany
would have been on the opposite side of Jerusalem from the Jericho
road on which Jesus was traveling.
Be that as it may, it is obvious that
Jesus had carefully planned his entrance into Jerusalem. First, it
seems likely that he had made prior arrangements with the owners of
the colt. It is mentioned that the colt “has never been ridden”,
because in the ancient world an animal intended for sacred use must
be unbroken. For example, this was also so for the red
heifer whose ashes cleansed from pollution (Numbers 19:2; Deut.
21:3).
What Jesus was doing here was
making a dramatic claim to be the Messiah! He knew that this would
be seen as a fulfillment of Zech. 9:9-10 – “Rejoice greatly, O
daughter Zion! Shout aloud, O daughter Jerusalem! Lo, your king
comes to you; triumphant and victorious is he, humble and riding on
a donkey, on a colt, the foal of a donkey. He will cut off the
chariot from Ephraim and the war-horse from Jerusalem; and the
battle bow shall be cut off, and he shall command peace to the
nations; his dominion shall be from sea to sea, and from the River
to the ends of the earth.” Note here, however, what kind of a
messiah Jesus is claiming to be by riding the colt. Not a Messiah
of war, but a messiah of PEACE!
The people in Jerusalem, however,
misunderstood Jesus’ dramatization. Their actions and greetings
show that although they may have believed him to be the Messiah,
they wanted to see him as a Messiah of WAR – as one who would
lead them to victory over the Romans.
For example, spreading their cloaks on
the road before him was what crowds had done to greet Jehu – a man
of war and bloodshed – when he was anointed king of Israel in the
Old Testament (2 Kings 9:13). Their shout of “Blessed is
the one who comes in the name of the Lord!” is from Psalm
118:26. William Barclay in his Daily Study Bible
commentary notes that this Psalm most likely was written in order to
commemorate the rededication of the Temple by Judas Maccabaeus in
167 B.C. after he had driven out the Syrian King Antiochus
Epiphanes. In other words, Psalm 118 is a conqueror’s psalm
– and the crowds were looking for Jesus to deliver them from Roman
oppression just as Judas Maccabaeus had delivered Israel in the
past! Finally, the word “Hosanna!” is not so much a shout of
praise as it is a plea for deliverance (it literally means
“Save now!”). The people were appealing for Jesus to save them
from their bondage to Rome!
People have consistently misunderstood
the Messiahship of Jesus and have wanted him to fulfill their
agendas. But Jesus’ agenda is service, suffering, and peace. Do
we share that agenda?
Matthew and Luke in their gospels then
show Jesus as immediately going into the temple and driving out the
moneychangers and sellers of animals – but Mark shows him as acting
much more deliberately. Jesus goes to the temple and looks around
at everything, but then goes to Bethany to spend the night before
returning the next day to drive out the merchants out. Mark
therefore shows that Jesus did not act in the heat of anger, but
that his actions were carefully considered to dramatize his
teaching.
CHAPTER 11:12-14
“Cursing the Fig Tree”
“On the following day,
when they came from Bethany, he was hungry. Seeing in the distance
a fig tree in leaf, he went to see whether perhaps he would find
anything on it. When he came to it, he found nothing but leaves,
for it was not the season for figs. He said to it, “May no one
ever eat fruit from you again.” And his disciples heard it.”
This, like all of Jesus’ actions in this chapter, is an enacted
parable. Figs in Palestine do not ripen until June – several
months after Passover – and so (as Mark makes clear) it was not the
season for figs. Jesus certainly knew that. His point is that
although the leaves symbolized the promise of fruit, that promise
would remain unfulfilled. In the same way, Israel’s promise
of bearing fruit for God was unfulfilled. William Barclay in his
Daily Study Bible commentary points out Luke in his gospel does
not relate this incident at all, but does have the parable of the
fruitless fig tree (Lk. 13:6-9). Both parables seem to be
making the same point – that the purpose of fig trees (and people
and Israel as a nation) is to bear fruit. If they do not,
they will face judgment.
CHAPTER 11:15-19
“Cleansing the Temple”
“Then they came to
Jerusalem. And he entered the temple and began to drive out those
who were selling and those who were buying in the temple, and he
overturned the tables of the money changers and the seats of those
who sold doves; and he would not allow anyone to carry anything
through the temple. He was teaching and saying, “Is it not
written, ‘My house shall be called a house of prayer for all the
nations’? But you have made it a den of robbers.” And when the
chief priests and the scribes heard it, they kept looking for a way
to kill him; for they were afraid of him, because the whole crowd
was spellbound by his teaching. And when evening came, Jesus and
his disciples went out of the city.”
This is another enacted parable by Jesus. Contrary to
popular interpretation, there is no indication that Jesus did what
he did out of anger. This was rather another demonstration of his
claim to Messiahship – fulfilling the prophecy of Malachi 3:1-4
that the Lord would purify the temple.
The commerce that was taking place in
the temple (actually, in the outer courtyards) was for the purpose
of helping people to meet ritual requirements. All Jews were
required to pay a temple tax of one half shekel a year. Pilgrims
would come an change their money into the required Jewish currency.
Doves (certified to be without blemish) were purchased by pilgrims
for temple sacrifices.
Some commentators have focused upon
possible abuses of this commerce – that perhaps the money changers
and the sellers of doves were making exorbitant profits. That may
or may not be so, but this does not seem to be the main issue that
Jesus is addressing. Jesus’ central protest is against the tendency
to “ritualize” religion. One’s relationship with God is
first and foremost a matter of the heart rather than insisting upon
the “correct” money and sacrificial offerings.
Needless to say, Jesus’ actions did
not sit well with the chief priests and scribes – for two reasons.
One is that Jesus’ protest did condemn their profit-making –
it is likely that the temple did receive income from the buying and
selling. The other reason is that they understood his actions to be
another claim to his being the Messiah – a Messiah who was beyond
their control and who might turn the people and the Romans against
them – and therefore they were afraid of him. This is the
first specific mention in Mark’s gospel that they wanted to kill
Jesus.
CHAPTER 11:20-26
“Lesson of the Withered Fig Tree”
“In the morning as they
passed by, they saw the fig tree withered away to its roots. Then
Peter remembered and said to him, “Rabbi, look! The fig tree
that you cursed has withered.” Jesus answered them, “Have
faith in God. Truly, I tell you, if you say to this mountain, ‘Be
taken up and thrown into the sea,’ and if you do not doubt in your
heart, but believe that what you say will come to pass, it will be
done for you. So I tell you, whatever you ask for in prayer,
believe that you have received it, and it will be yours. Whenever
you stand praying, forgive, if you have anything against anyone; so
that your Father in heaven may also forgive you your trespasses.”
This is a very difficult section to understand. The theme of Jesus’
earlier cursing of the fig tree and his teachings on faith and
prayer in this passage do not seem to be naturally related. It
appears that Mark wanted to include these sayings of Jesus in his
gospel, and decided that this section was as good of a place as any
to do so!
Jesus’ teaching of The Lord’s
Prayer occurs in the gospels of Matthew (Mt. 6:9-15) and
Luke (Lk. 11:2-4), but not in Mark’s gospel. This section
seems to be the equivalent. According to William Barclay, this
passage gives us three rules for prayer:
-
It must be a prayer of
faith. The
phrase about moving mountains was a common Jewish phrase meaning
removing difficulties. With faith, prayer is a
power that can solve any problem and make us able to deal with
any difficulty IF
i)
We take our
problems and difficulties to God –
rather than trying to deal with them by ourselves.
ii)
We are ready
to accept God’s guidance when he gives it.
“Not my will, but thine be done!”
-
It must be a prayer of
expectation.
When we pray, it must never be a mere formality. It must never
be a ritual without hope.
-
It must be a prayer of
charity. As
Barclay puts it, the prayer of a bitter person cannot penetrate
the wall of his own bitterness. Only when we are willing to
forgive others as God is willing to forgive our trespasses, can
we then be in a relationship with God that will make our
prayer communication with him powerful and effective.
CHAPTER 11:27-33 “The
Authority of Jesus”
“Again they came to
Jerusalem. As he was walking in the temple, the chief priests, the
scribes, and the elders came to him and said, “By what authority
are you doing these things? Who gave you this authority to do them?”
Jesus said to them, “I will ask you one question; answer me, and
I will tell you by what authority I do these things. Did the
baptism of John come from heaven, or was it of human origin? Answer
me.” They argued with one another, “If we say, ‘From
heaven,’ he will say, ‘Why then did you not believe him?’ But shall
we say, ‘Of human origin’?” – they were afraid of the crowd, for
all regarded John as truly a prophet. So they answered Jesus, “We
do not know.” And Jesus said to them, “Neither will I tell
you by what authority I am doing these things.”
Mark had a block of five controversy stories during
the early part of Jesus’ ministry (2:1-3:6) – and now he
begins another block of five controversy stories during the early
part of Jesus’ ministry in Jerusalem (11:27-12:37).
Jesus’ dramatizations of his
Messiahship had obviously upset the religious authorities. In this
scene, a delegation from the chief priests (the
“practitioners” of temple religion), the scribes (the
accredited teachers of Jewish religion), and the elders (the
Sanhedrin – the chief religious council) came to confront Jesus.
They demanded an answer as to what gave him (an unaccredited lay
person) the authority to do and teach what he did. They thought
that no matter how Jesus answered, he would come out a loser. If he
was to claim that it was by his own authority, they could have him
arrested as a megalomaniac before he created any further upset. Or
if he was to claim that he was acting on the authority of God, they
could arrest him on the charge of blasphemy.
Jesus here shows himself to be a
skillful debater. Rather than answering them head on, he challenges
them to describe the authority behind the ministry of John the
Baptist. If they were to acknowledge that John’s ministry was from
God, he would be able to ask them why they did not believe him – or
if they were to deny the divine authorization of John’s ministry,
they would lose the popular support of the people. Therefore, they
had to refuse answering Jesus – and Jesus was able to escape their
trap.
Be that as it may, it is obvious that
Mark regards both the ministry of John and Jesus as being from
heaven. The “proof” was that people’s lives had been changed in
dramatic and powerful ways by their ministry and teaching.
William Barclay in his Daily Study
Bible commentary states that this story is a vivid example of
what happens to people who will not face the truth. As he puts it:
“They have to twist and wriggle and in the end get themselves
into a position in which they are so helplessly involved that they
have nothing to say. The person who faces the truth may have the
humiliation of saying that he was wrong, or the peril of standing by
it, but at least the future for him is strong and bright. But the
person who will not face the truth has nothing but the prospect of
deeper and deeper involvement in a situation which renders him
helpless and ineffective.” May we as God’s people always be
willing to face the truth rather than trying to avoid or deny it.
Then our lives will be effective, both for ourselves and for others
as well.
--------------------
George R.
Karres,
Pella
Lutheran Church
418 W. Main
Street
Sidney, MT
59270
gkarres@pellachurch.com
|