|
The Gospel of Mark
Introduction
Chapter 1
Chapter 2
Chapter 3
Chapter 4
Chapter 5
Chapter 6
Chapter 7
Chapter 8
Chapter 9
Chapter 10
Chapter 11
Chapter 12
Chapter 13
Chapter 14
Chapter 15
Chapter 16
|
BIBLE STUDY
MARK 6:1-56
REVIEW:
“Do not fear, only believe.”
Chapter 5 consisted of two miracles stories (two of a set of three
beginning at Mark 4:35 with Jesus’ calming of the storm at sea).
The first miracle of Chapter 5 was Jesus’ cleansing of the man
possessed by a “Legion” of unclean spirits. The second was the
intertwined stories of Jairus’ daughter, whom Jesus delivered from
death, and the woman with chronic hemorrhaging, who was healed
simply by touching the hem of his garment. As Jesus’ power and
authority are repeatedly shown to be stronger than other powers
hostile to human life, a definite editorial theme emerges in Mark’s
Gospel. In fact, the entire section (Mark 4:35-5:43) is book-ended
by this implicit command…”Do not fear, only believe.” See Mark
4:40 and Mark 5:36.
CHAPTER 6:1-13 “Without
Honor in Their Hometown”
He left that place and
came to his hometown, and his disciples followed him. On the
Sabbath he began to teach in the synagogue, and many who heard him
were astounded. They said, “Where did this man get all this?
What is this wisdom that has been given to him? What deeds of power
are being done by his hands? Is not his the carpenter, the son of
Mary and brother of James and Joses and Judas and Simon, and are not
his sisters here with us?” And they took offense at him. Then
Jesus said to them, “Prophets are not without honor, except in
their hometown, and among their own kin, and in their own house.”
And he could do no deed of power there, except that he laid his
hands on a few sick people and cured them. And he was amazed at
their unbelief. Then he went about among the villages teaching. He
called the twelve and began to send them out two by two, and gave
them authority over the unclean spirits. He ordered them to take
nothing for their journey except a staff; no bread, no bag, no money
in their belts; but to wear sandals and not to put on two tunics.
He said to them, “Wherever you enter a house, stay there until
you leave the place. If any place will not welcome you and they
refuse to hear you, as you leave, shake off the dust that is on your
feet as a testimony against them.” So they went out and
proclaimed that all should repent. They cast out many demons, and
anointed with oil many who were sick and cured them.
In this section we find Jesus returning to “his hometown,”
presumably Nazareth, where he was apparently not received with the
openness and enthusiasm befitting someone of his revealed stature.
Recall the proceeding section, which repeatedly illustrated Jesus’
power and authority and emphasized the frenzied crowd, amazed by his
work, trying to get as close to him as possible.
This section stands in stark
contrast. Rather than focusing on the great uniqueness of Jesus,
his power and authority, his potential to bring great changes
through healing and teaching, the people of his hometown dwell on
his familiarity—his familial identity, his humble origin, his former
job. This apparently leaves these people, most of them at least (a
few sick people got cured), unable to experience the divine ministry
being brought into the world in Jesus. I wonder, in our own time,
how much of God’s work or the potential found in those closest to
us, we don’t see because of our own preconceptions of them?
It is striking to me, reading in
Mark’s Gospel, the power of the people to limit Jesus’ ability.
“And he could do no deed of power there….” Again, in contrast to the
previous chapters where the people have been amazed by Jesus’ works
in a positive sense, here Jesus is amazed “at their
unbelief.” Also, notice the significance this has on the
Christology of Jesus. Here he seems totally human—a low
Christology. Compare to the version, most scholars believe was
written some 10-20 years later in Matthew’s Gospel (13:57-58).
Look at the judgment that occurs in
this passage. It is practically applied. Unable to perform his
works on account of their unbelief, Jesus has no other recourse than
to move on…to go about in other villages teaching. Their loss. In
the next passage, Jesus will call his disciples to himself. His
disciples, in contrast to the people from his hometown, do accept
his teaching and his power and they gain access to it.
This passage forces us not to forget
the church’s origin as a missionary community. While staying rooted
in one location can bring a certain element of stability to our
lives, let us not forget the loss of freedom that a closed community
can inflict on its people (Jesus himself, found himself virtually
powerless). Instructed by Jesus, his disciples were never supposed
to let themselves get bogged down with possessions or with fighting,
or with fear. There is freedom in being a disciple of Jesus.
Question: How does this passage inform our own church identity?
CHAPTER 6:14-16
“Naming Jesus”
King Herod heard of it, for
Jesus’ name had become known. Some were saying, “John the
baptizer has been raised from the dead; and for this reason these
powers are at work in him.” But others said, “It is Elijah.”
And others said, “It is a prophet, like one of the prophets of
old.” But when Herod heard of it, he said, “John, whom I
beheaded, has been raised.”
At this point in the story we learn
that, despite of his attempts to keep his messianic identity secret,
Jesus apparently had received a fair amount of publicity—enough
publicity for his name, or his reputation, to have reached the ears
of Herod. King Herod described here is Herod Antipas, the son of
Herod the Great. After Herod the Great’s death, Herod Antipas
became ruler of Galilee and Perea and ruled from 4 BCE to 39 CE.
It is interest to learn what people
were saying about Jesus now that his name, or his reputation, had
become known? Many, including Herod, identified him with the most
recently deceased prophet, John the Baptist. Others saw in him as
the prophet Elijah, who is viewed in Jewish tradition as the
precursor to the messiah. Public opinion, in contrast to the people
in his hometown, at a bare minimum, recognized him as “one of the
prophets.” All of these early interpretations hold that Jesus was a
prophet …one who speaks on behalf of God.
In a way, this passage speaks to the
nature of prophets. Prophets give image to an invisible God.
Through his encounter with John the Baptist, Herod Antipas certainly
encountered the voice of God and will forever be haunted by this
tragic encounter. Question: Through whose prophetic voice do we
(hint: as Christians) encounter and experience God?
CHAPTER 6:17-29 “The Death
of John the Baptist”
For Herod himself had sent
men who arrested John, bound him, and put him in prison on account
of Herodias, his brother Philip’s wife, because Herod had married
her. For John had been telling Herod, “It is not lawful for you
to have your brother’s wife.” And Herodias had a grudge against
him, and wanted to kill him. But she could not, for Herod feared
John, knowing that he was a righteous and holy man, and he protected
him. When he heard him, he was greatly perplexed; and yet he liked
to listen to him. But an opportunity came when Herod on his
birthday gave a banquet for his courtiers and officers and for the
leaders of Galilee. When his daughter Herodias came in and danced
she pleased Herod and his guests; and the king said to the girl, “Ask
me for whatever you wish, and I will give it.” And he solemnly
swore to her, “Whatever you ask me, I will give you, even half of
my kingdom.” She went out and said to her mother, “What
should I ask for?” She replied, “The head of John the
baptizer.” Immediately she rushed back to king and requested, “I
want you to give me at once the head of John the Baptist on a
platter.” The king was deeply grieved; yet out of regard for
his oaths and for the guests, he did not want to refuse her.
Immediately the king sent a soldier of the guard with orders to
bring John’s head. He went and beheaded him in the prison, brought
his head on a platter, and gave it to the girl. Then the girl gave
it to her mother. When his disciples heard about it, they came and
took his body, and laid it in a tomb.
Beginning with this narrative, we will see that Mark
does indeed identify John the Baptist with Elijah. As stated by
John R. Donahue and Daniel J. Harrington, in their commentary on the
Gospel of Mark, this story has strong parallels to the Jezebel and
Elijah motif found in 1Kings (18:1-46, 21:1-29). Herod, while he
saw John’s righteousness and liked to listen to him, finds himself
unable to counteract the wicked plot of Herodias to kill the
prophet.
The broader relevance of this story in
the Gospel of Mark is of course a messianic claim for Jesus. For, as
stated above, Elijah was viewed as the messiah’s precursor. Also,
by sandwiching this narrative between the sending out of the twelve
disciples (6:7-13) and their return (6:30-32), it could serve as a
reminder that prophetic figures may be expected to suffer and to die
at the hands of rulers who “lord it over.” Again, a good point made
by Donahue and Harrington is that “this story would be a sobering
reminder to (its original audience) a church under pressure from the
Roman imperial authorities.”
CHAPTER 6:30-44
“Feeding the Five Thousand”
The apostles gathered
around Jesus, and told him all that they had done and taught. He
said to them, “Come away to a deserted place all by yourselves
and rest a while.” For many were coming and going, and they had
no leisure even to eat. And they went away in the boat to a
deserted place by themselves. Now many saw them going and
recognized them, and they hurried there on foot from all the towns
and arrived ahead of them. As they went ashore, he saw a great
crowd; and he had compassion for them, because they were like sheep
without a shepherd; and he began to teach them many things. When it
grew late, his disciples came to him and said, “This is a
deserted place, and the hour is now very late; send them away so
that they may go into the surrounding country and villages and buy
something for themselves to eat.” But he answered them, “You
give them something to eat.” They said to him, “Are we to go
and buy two hundred denarii worth of bread, and give it to them to
eat?” And he said to them, “How many loaves have you? Go
and see.” When they had found out, they said, “Five, and two
fish.” Then he ordered them to get all the people to sit down
in groups on the green grass. So they sat down in groups of
hundreds and of fifties. Taking the five loaves and the two fish,
he looked up to heaven, and blessed and broke the loaves, and gave
them to his disciples to set before the people; and he divided the
two fish among them all. And all ate and were filled; and they took
up twelve baskets full of broken pieces and of the fish. Those who
had eaten the loaves numbered five thousand men.
Already we have seen how biblical images
from the Old Testament have been recast (in history and in
scripture) to add nuance and meaning to a new story as it unfolds.
Likewise, this beautifully crafted “Feeding of the Five Thousand”
would have seemed quite familiar to an audience versed in the
stories of the First Testament. Ripe with unexpected irony and
pointed imagery, Mark here paints a memorable image of what I,
Pastor Josh, call “Jesus the Prophet of Peace.”
First, it should be stated that the
occurrences here on this secluded mountain would immediately and
obviously call to the peoples’ minds the works of a different
Prophet from another time. In 2 Kings 4:42-44 it was the Prophet
Elisha who performed a similar miracle, feeding one-hundred people
with twenty loaves, and there was some left over! This being said,
it should be obvious that the message in the Gospels, by comparison,
shows how much greater Jesus is, even than the great Prophet
Elisha. For the numbers are drastically inflated in this miracle as
Jesus feeds five-thousand men with five loaves and two fish. In
John’s Gospel, the narrator even hints at the crowd’s familiarity
with this story and its meaning. Upon seeing this sign unfold
before them, they proclaim, “This is indeed the prophet who is to
come into the world!”
An interesting aspect of Marks telling
of this story is that things seem deliberately ironic. That is,
things unfold exactly opposite of how the reader (and the disciples)
expect them to unfold. For example, what begins as an attempt by
Jesus and his disciples to get away by themselves, winds up
being a huge gathering. The “deserted” place is opposite of
deserted. The crowd that is following Jesus and his
disciples winds up not following, but arriving ahead of
them. The fish and loaves, which seems not enough, winds up
being more than enough. The gathering crowd, those apparent
outsiders who seem to be unexpected, uninvited and unwelcome,
find themselves on the inside. That is, they were received
by Jesus and, “he began to teach them many things.”
The only thing that remains consistent
in this story, a detail which goes to the heart of the message of
Mark, is the restful nature of this event. From beginning to end,
the goal of this outing is for the purpose of taking rest.
They are going to a place, a deserted place, a place set apart for
the purpose of rest. Despite of the near adversarial behavior of
the disciples, what remains is…a restful event. They gather
together in groups, protected by a shepherd, seated on the plush
green grass and have a meal together in which there is more than
enough. Again, we should not have to search far to find rich
biblical imagery of a shepherd providing rest and food on green
grass (See Psalm 23:2-5).
And at the heart of the story is
the prophetic figure…Jesus. He is the one who has compassion.
According to Donohue and Harrington, the root of the Greek word used
for compassion “is used for the inner parts
of the body (“guts”) and for the seat of emotions as well as for the
heart. The term is virtually synonym for the Hebrew word, meaning
merciful love, which is an OT quality of God” (Isa 54:7-8).
CHAPTER 6:45-52
“Jesus Walks on Water”
Immediately he made his
disciples get into the boat and go on ahead to the other side, to
Bethsaida, while he dismissed the crowd. After saying farewell to
them, he went up on the mountain to pray. When evening came, the
boat was out on the sea, and he was alone on the land. When he saw
that they were straining at the oars against an adverse wind, he
came towards them early in the morning, walking on the sea. He
intended to pass them by. But when they saw him walking on the sea,
they thought it was a ghost and cried out; for they all saw him and
were terrified. But immediately he spoke to them and said, “Take
heart, it is I; do not be afraid.” Then he got into the boat
with them and the wind ceased. And they were utterly astounded, for
they did not understand about the loaves, but their hearts were
hardened. Although at first it may
seem to the modern day reader that Jesus is planning to leave his
disciples behind, for it reads, “He intended to pass them by,” this
is actually an allusion to another vivid and well known story from
the Hebrew scripture. It evokes God’s epiphany—God’s revealing of
himself—to Moses (Exodus 33:19-23 and 34:6). In this story, Jesus
intends (or attempts) to disclose his true identity to his disciples
in an amazing revelation. However, he finds the disciples unable to
receive the revelation. Rather than being privileged, unique,
blessed (like Moses), they are terrified. Jesus winds up
immediately having to comfort them amidst the storm.
Many scholars believe that there is a
theological premise in Mark—a description of the world’s design and
of the human dilemma. It holds that the clear revelation of God in
Jesus Christ divides the world into two sides…Insiders and
outsiders. That is, misunderstandings about God exist among people
despite of God’s clear revelation in Jesus Christ. The disciples in
this story serve as the personification of the hardened heart—a
people unable to understand—or as Donohue and Harrington phrase it,
they are impervious to God’s revelation. Still bewildered by the
miracle of the feeding of the five thousand, the disciples remain
unable to understand the revelation of God in Jesus Christ. So,
perhaps the story found in Mark about Jesus, is also a story about
the disciples’ struggle to come to an understanding of who this
Jesus character really is. Perhaps this can be of some comfort to
us as we struggle to understand Jesus in our own lives. Perhaps,
rather than fearing our own inability to see, we should see this as
part of the story—part of our spiritual journey—our own walks with
Jesus.
CHAPTER 6:53-56
“Healing in Gennesaret”
When they had crossed
over, they came to land at Gennesaret and moored the boat. When
they got out of the boat, people at once recognized him, and rushed
about that whole region and began to bring the sick on mats to
wherever they heard he was. And wherever he went, into villages or
cities or farms, they laid the sick in the marketplaces, and begged
him that they might touch even the fringe of his cloak; and all who
touched it were healed. This passage
is the second of two transitional summaries of Jesus’ mighty works
(see 3:7-12). In effect, this short section gives a broad
description of his healing ministry and the magnitude of the crowd
that now seeks him. It sets the stage for Jesus next encounter with
his chief adversaries…the Pharisees and Scribes.
--------------------
Joshua W. Magyar,
Pella
Lutheran Church
418 W. Main
Street
Sidney, MT
59270
jmagyar@pellachurch.com
|